BUSINESSECONOMY

Gachagua Secures Ksh200M in ARA U-Turn

Share
Gachagua had maintained that the cases against him were politically instigated, arguing that tenders his companies secured were above board.
Gachagua had maintained that the cases against him were politically instigated, arguing that tenders his companies secured were above board.
Share

The Assets Recovery Agency (ARA) wants Ksh200 million forfeited to the State returned to Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua. The cash, held at Rafiki Microfinance Bank, was forfeited as part of a graft case against Gachagua.

Before backtracking, the DCI had told the court that the funds were acquired illegitimately, and presented a paper trail of dealings between Gachagua-linked companies and the Bungoma County government among other government institutions between 2011 and 2016. It was on this basis that the ARA seized Gachagua’s wealth.  ARA, however, is now distancing itself from the DCI evidence stating that, after conducting its own independent investigation, it found that the money was legitimately acquired and not proceeds of críme as had been presented in court.

Gachagua had maintained that the cases against him were politically instigated, arguing that tenders his companies secured were above board. The ARA independent investigation and u-turn on the forfeiture was based on the admission by the DCI in October 2022 that the investigation against Gachagua was deeply flawed.

READ>Hilton Closes CBD Doors, Preps New Location

Superintendent of Police Kuriah Obadiah, who is based at the DCI’s Kiambu Road headquarters, told a court that at the time of Gachagua’s arrèst and arraignment in July 2021 in a Ksh7.3 billion graft case, there was no documentary evidence to support the case against him and investigations were not complete.

Obadiah in a sworn affidavit stated that officers were pushed to arrèst and charge Gachagua with economic crimès.

In the most recent development, Sergeant Fred Musyoki who is attached to the ARA told the court: “The evidence obtained has satisfactorily explained the source and legitimacy of the funds at issue and the ARA is satisfied that the same is not proceeds of crimè as was initially perceived and should be released to Mr Gachagua and Ms Anne Kimemia.”

Explaining why the ARA investigation found the tenders to be above board, Musyoki stated that “the companies performed their obligation as per the terms and conditions of the contracts to the satisfaction of the institutions.”

READ>Standard Group Journalists Set to Strike in January

 

 

Written by
BUSINESS TODAY -

editor [at] businesstoday.co.ke

Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW IN POLITICS

FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA

Related Articles
Kenya Power meets editor on cost of electricity
ECONOMYNEWS

Kenya Power Reveals Trick Behind Falling Cost of Electricity

The cost of electricity has been steadily declining over the last 12...

Animators training - film makers training
BUSINESSTECHNOLOGY

Konza Technopolis in Partnership to Train 100 Animators

Konza Technopolis in partnership with the Kenya Film Commission (KFC) will train...

data privacy protection in Kenya
BUSINESSTECHNOLOGY

African Countries Playing Catch-Up in Data Privacy Protection

As Africa’s digital ecosystem expands, countries are increasing efforts towards data privacy...

KRA Tax Waiver 2025
BUSINESSSMART MONEY

KRA Forfeits Ksh140 Billion in Tax Waiver to Lure Trillions

Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) is offering taxpayers an opportunity to ease their...