The Tax Appeals Tribunal has barred a former officer of the Kenya Revenue
Authority from representing the adverse party in a matter involving a decision
made by the officer.
Mr Patrick Chege, having intimate knowledge about the matter while in the employment of the Authority participated in making an objection decision in the tax case of ICEA Lion Life Assurance Company vs Commissioner of Domestic Taxes.
In a ruling delivered on 16th July 2021, the Tribunal heard that Mr. Patrick Chege
was previously a senior employee of KRA before leaving the position. While in the
employment of the Authority, he made an objection decision on behalf of the
Commissioner, the subject of the current appeal at the Tribunal by ICEA Lion Life
Assurance Company that he sought to represent in the proceedings.
READ>>>>>London Distillers Battles Ksh2 Billion Tax Evasion Case
In a message of disapproval of representation of a client by a person with
conflict of interest in legal proceedings, the Tribunal, relying on well-settled
doctrines observed that one of the basic principles of natural justice is that no
person can be a judge in a case in which they have an interest.
Having made the objection decision for the Commissioner of Domestic Taxes, Mr.
Chege could not represent the company against the Commissioner over the same
decision.
In any case, the Tribunal added, justice must not only be done, it must
be seen to be done.
